For lots of us involved in educating others, we are aware of the importance of identifying techniques and tactics, in addition to knowing the difference. As a working definition, understanding that there could be some technical wording differences among coaches, a strategy is using a game plan in reaction to a problem.
Techniques are far more specific and complex. They are dependent on several things to be prosperous, not the least of being adept. If you want to know more about the firearm training, visit https://heartlandgunclubs.com/classes/.
Image Source Google
I believe that quiet techniques are new. That being said, there'll always be teachers who will streamline and modify a technique and make it more effective and productive.
I'm not positive whether that frees the teacher to put his name on the method, but a fantastic instructor might want to recognize the development and research of others when passing something to his pupils.
Naturally, that might not always be possible when techniques are altered regularly and you aren't an amateur historian. An example may be low light shooting techniques using a flashlight. We have all heard of the Harries, FBI, Chapman, Rogers, Ayoob, etc. flashlight grip.
As a point of reference, recognizing the participation of the teachers helps us remember the technique. Needless to say, we then muddy the water by adding the dreaded"altered" word to the method.
Modified Weaver Stance, Modified FBI, etc., and so forth simply means the technique is or is not the initially taught method.